Article index
In mid-September, Vietnamese news outlet VietNamNet cited a report from Xinhua Daily about a company in Nantong, China: exactly 11 human staff running 634 storefronts across Amazon, eBay, and Temu with the support of 932 "digital workers". Skimming the headline, one might assume machines are outright replacing human workers. Yet the reporting itself noted that 100 or 900 AI agents do not equal 100 or 900 people. Humans still set the objectives, design the workflows, and carry final accountability; the AI executes.
The phrase AI virtual employee easily tempts leaders into picturing plug-and-play software that performs out of the box like a seasoned professional. Reality is far less romantic. If your team cannot write a coherent job description on paper for that role, rushing an AI agent into live operations will only magnify the chaos faster.
Tools are getting cheaper; the hard part is defining the job
Technically speaking, assembling a digital worker has never been more accessible. On September 10, 2026, OpenAI launched its Agents API public beta, allowing developers to spin up cloud sandboxes where agents can run code, work with files, produce outputs, and maintain long-running session state. OpenAI does not charge a standalone fee for the API; teams pay for the tokens and tools consumed (with hosted container pricing for the sandbox). The foundational building blocks for autonomous assistants are readily available.
Yet having cheap building blocks does not automatically produce capable staff. Speaking at the Vietnam Digital Finance 2026 event, Nguyen Van Quang from VNPT AI noted that AI was never designed to replace humans wholesale. Its primary role is buffering capacity deficits during demand spikes, absorbing repetitive workloads so that specialized staff can concentrate on complex escalations. Data cited by VNPT regarding their iSense rollout at telecom provider VinaPhone, as reported by Vietnamese financial outlet CafeBiz (not independently verified), claims the system automatically scores 100% of customer calls—roughly 100,000 interactions daily—optimizing about VND 5.8 billion in 2025 operating overhead while lifting routine burdens off approximately 180 call center agents.
That is an instructive case study of an effective digital worker: an extremely narrow mandate, strict boundaries, and unequivocal acceptance criteria.

Drafting a JD for an AI virtual employee
To evaluate whether your organization is ready, sit down and draft a job description for the position you intend to delegate. Suppose you run a trading enterprise and want an AI assistant to handle returned shipment reconciliations. A workable job description should look like this:
Job Description: Return Order Reconciliation Assistant (Hypothetical)
- Core responsibilities: Daily at 07:00 AM, retrieve the list of return tracking codes from partner courier portals; reconcile them against internal warehouse records; flag any discrepancies lingering past 48 hours onto the operational tracking sheet.
- Authorized tools: Read access to courier delivery APIs, write access to update reconciliation sheets, and permission to post status summaries into the internal warehouse messaging channel.
- Strictly prohibited actions: Never trigger refund approvals on payment gateways; never close customer support tickets; never send outbound emails to external parties.
- Escalation triggers: Any order with a discrepancy value exceeding VND 500,000 or suspected package loss must immediately be tagged and routed to the warehouse lead for manual sign-off.
- Definition of done: The reconciliation log is published by 08:30 AM, with 100% of the previous day's return tags accurately categorized without data overwrites.
Look closely at that outline: there are no vague buzzwords about "optimizing workflows" or "delivering seamless support". It itemizes every permission boundary and safety threshold. If you cannot specify those five points for your own operational bottlenecks, hold off on engaging AI vendors.

What our internal rulebooks taught us
At KacherSoft, we run an internal cohort of specialized agents to process documents and handle day-to-day data pipelines. Nothing worked like magic on day one. Every single agent requires a written rulebook detailing precisely what it is permitted to touch, what actions are strictly forbidden, and under what specific conditions it must pause to seek human approval.
Operating guidelines are never static. Every time an agent makes an unpredicted, silly error, we sit down and add one more line to the list of things it must never do.
Releasing an autonomous agent into live systems without an orchestration layer risks not only data corruption but also severe partner trust issues. When running workloads in production, establishing runtime agent monitoring is an existential operational safeguard rather than a cosmetic add-on.
Instead of boasting about headcount metrics for digital workers, measure how many well-bounded, repetitive tasks are cleanly resolved and verified each week. An AI virtual employee only functions as an employee when it holds a clearly defined role, operates under human supervision, and settles concrete operational steps within your business.
The path forward
Start with assessment, partnership, and one measured pilot.
Talk to an expert